That’s one of the worst calls ever. Zobrist is being far too kind…

Really, Red Sox?

Really, Red Sox?

Youkilis: It just doesn’t look right…

Youkilis: It just doesn’t look right…

Boston Red Sox games must have been a psychiatrist’s dream last season, given all of the apparent dysfunction and frustration, given all of the telling body language.

Most managers and pitching coaches stand relatively close together during games, but Bobby Valentine and Bob McClure often were far apart — and there were instances when McClure visited a struggling pitcher on the mound, returned to the dugout and sat without reporting back to Valentine.

Not surprisingly, McClure did not last the season.

I remember watching a Red Sox pitcher stare down Valentine, like he was aiming lasers, as the manager made a slow walk to the mound. Sometimes, infielders preferred to stay at their position rather than participate in the meetings, because of lingering issues.

And this all started even before the first day of spring training. When the players learned about some of the drills that Valentine had planned for them, including one in which they hit the ball to teammates using a fungo bat, the players couldn’t believe it.

Midway through the season, one player summed up the mental state of the Red Sox: “Everybody hates everybody.”

Owners of the Boston Red Sox thought the team wasn’t marketable after the 2010 season and needed to add “sexy players,” former general manager Theo Epstein says in a new book co-written by former manager Terry Francona.

Epstein says owner John Henry, chairman Tom Werner and president Larry Lucchino made the team’s image a priority, according to excerpts released Tuesday by Sports Illustrated. “Francona: The Red Sox Years” is co-written by the Boston Globe’s Dan Shaughnessy and is scheduled for publication by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt on Jan. 22.

“They told us we didn’t have any marketable players. We need some sexy guys,” Epstein was quoted as saying.

Francona said of the ownership group: “I don’t think they love baseball. I think they like baseball. … It’s still more of a toy or hobby for them.”

4gifs:

A knuckleball is thrown with minimal spin, causing unpredictable motion

4gifs:

A knuckleball is thrown with minimal spin, causing unpredictable motion

(Source: ForGIFs.com, via cracked)

The Red Sox pounced on Victorino, at a high price: Three years, $38 million. Boston will play him in right field, at least for year one of the contract, with the defensively limited Jonny Gomes handling the limited real estate in left and Jacoby Ellsbury in the final year of his contract back in center.

Baseball is very much a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately business, which is what makes the size of the reported offer so interesting. From 2008 through 2011, Victorino ranked as the 21st-most valuable position player in baseball, combining blazing speed with solid extra-base power, good center-field defense, and plus on-base skills. His 2011 season was especially huge: .279/.355/.491, with 27 doubles, 16 triples, and 17 homers in 132 games, and career highs in slugging and WAR. That power outburst looks like an outlier compared to the rest of his career, though, with Victorino’s numbers nosediving to .255/.321/.383. So did the Red Sox get the 6-win player of 2011, or the 3-win player of 2012? If it’s the latter, Victorino’s age (32) and his speed-based skill set make him a regression risk over the life of the contract. On the other hand, the Sox run a money factory; even with Victorino, their salary for the entire roster shouldn’t go much beyond $120 million, and Victorino offers a much cheaper option than Michael Bourn or Josh Hamilton. He also ensures that the Sox don’t have to trade one of their premium prospects to plug that outfield hole. Given the team’s time frame for contending probably kicks in after a reloading year in 2013, we’re probably talking about a mild overpay for a rich team on a stopgap player who won’t kill you. You’re not getting a parade, but you can probably cancel the witch hunt, too.

Bowie Kuhn, the commissioner of baseball, once accused Miller of failing to “reciprocate” his overtures of friendship. Miller responded that Kuhn was not trying to be friends, he was trying to “pick my brains,” and “there was scant possibility of reciprocity in that department.”

Baseball’s Hall of Fame has people in it whose primary contribution to the game was the particular way they called a home run from the broadcasting booth. It has people in it like the former Red Sox owner Tom Yawkey, whose principal achievement was inheriting enough money to buy the Red Sox and waiting a full eighteen years after Jackie Robinson broke baseball’s color line to sign his first full-time black player. But Marvin Miller? He got voted down, again and again, the victim of a nominating committee handpicked by the owners. Even after he pried open their sport to the modern world, after he helped turn baseball from a feudal enterprise into a big business, the owners still hated him. Most of the time, the beautiful game overshadows the sordid world of the owner’s box. The best way to mourn the passing of Marvin Miller—one of the twentieth century’s great heroes—is to remember that there are still too many occasions when it does not.

But here’s the thing: A few years from now, there’s a good chance we’ll look back at even a number like $100 million and wonder how the Rays secured the rights to their franchise player for so long and so cheap. Baseball’s revenue streams are exploding, with the new national TV contract funneling an additional $25 million a year into each team’s coffers starting in 2014. Local TV deals offer even more potential for riches. Guggenheim Partners bought the Dodgers in the spring for $2.15 billion, started flexing their financial muscle in earnest a few months later, and if the latest reports are accurate, might be on their way to a 25-year deal with Fox worth as much as $7 billion.

The Rays have been out in front on many trends over the past half-decade, from loading the roster with undervalued defensive wizards to tacking on club options to every deal possible, even for relief pitchers approaching their 40s.

The going rate for a win on the open market now lies somewhere between $5 million and $6 million, depending on how this hot stove season shakes out. Given the combination of typical 5 percent per year salary inflation and the media revenue forces to come, it may very well cost close to $10 million by the time Longoria’s new contract expires in a decade. So even if you’re skeptical of a player who’s never posted a .900 OPS (Tropicana Field significantly suppresses offense, but still), derives much of his value from defense (good luck getting one publicly available measure of defense everyone can agree on), and has legitimate injury concerns, Longoria doesn’t need to perform like a superstar in the later years of the deal for the Rays to get good value on their investment. If he stays near his current level for the next few years, then ages into a merely average player by the time the next decade rolls around, that would be more than enough.

Valentine is very smart and, like Collins and Showalter, has a bottomless passion for baseball, and maybe, if everything had played out differently, the players would have come to see that. But right away, Valentine reinforced the preconceived notions they had about him.

According to sources within the organization, Valentine had asked for a change in the way that cutoff plays were run, and when he walked onto a field very early in spring training, what he saw almost immediately was that shortstop Mike Aviles was not where he wanted him to be. Valentine loudly and profanely questioned Aviles’ aptitude, others in the organization say. What Valentine did not know at that moment was that the Red Sox players hadn’t yet been instructed on where to go in the new cutoff alignment.

Aviles is highly respected, a grinder, and other players were bothered enough by the exchange that three leaders on the team — Dustin Pedroia, David Ortiz and Adrian Gonzalez — went to Valentine to express concern and provide context for Aviles’ mistake. Gonzalez, sources say, asked Valentine that if he wanted to get on a player verbally, the first baseman would be OK with being a target, because he could take it.

It was a moment that others in the organization now look back on as a crossroad in Valentine’s year as manager, because in that instant, Valentine could have gone one of two ways.

He could have listened to the players, embraced what they were saying, called a team meeting the next day and built on the incident. He could have apologized to Aviles and then told all of them, in so many words, Mike, you should know that these three guys over here — Ortiz, Pedroia and Gonzalez — have your back and are really good teammates, and that’s a great thing. And I’m really feeling good about what we have in this room.

“But it didn’t go that way,” said a member of the organization.

Valentine did express regret to Aviles. But the players perceived Valentine as being miffed by the situation, as if the players had overreacted to something that he felt was innocuous. The players perceived that Valentine felt his authority was being challenged.

Right away, this incident badly damaged the fragile connection between he and the players, and was probably destroyed once and for all by his comments about Kevin Youkilis in April.